<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 4 Alternative Blogging Interfaces for WordPress</title>
	<atom:link href="http://clintlalonde.net/2009/09/24/4-alternative-blogging-interfaces-for-wordpress/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://clintlalonde.net/2009/09/24/4-alternative-blogging-interfaces-for-wordpress/</link>
	<description>Trying to balance the ed with the tech</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 22:22:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://clintlalonde.net/2009/09/24/4-alternative-blogging-interfaces-for-wordpress/comment-page-1/#comment-2991</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 08:02:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clintlalonde.net/?p=492#comment-2991</guid>
		<description>Interesting thoughts Clint.  To be honest though, with the exception of email and Word, these methods have the user in the browser already and, as such, the WP interface would be the most elegant solution. 
 
There are also ways of posting the daily Delicious bookmarks to any blog, and I&#039;m wondering if Posterous integration is something we&#039;ll see.  Frankly the ways of having one social tool show up in another stream is starting to make me cross-eyed. 
 
With regard to Word, the blog post will likely need to be cleaned up and tagged or categorized later, while the email really comes into its own if you&#039;re doing mobile blogging.  If WP would develop a really good smartphone app, then you&#039;d have something. 
 
I also think about ways people can post from other apps to their WP blogs, but so far as your post alludes to, the options aren&#039;t all that great.   </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting thoughts Clint.  To be honest though, with the exception of email and Word, these methods have the user in the browser already and, as such, the WP interface would be the most elegant solution. </p>
<p>There are also ways of posting the daily Delicious bookmarks to any blog, and I&#039;m wondering if Posterous integration is something we&#039;ll see.  Frankly the ways of having one social tool show up in another stream is starting to make me cross-eyed. </p>
<p>With regard to Word, the blog post will likely need to be cleaned up and tagged or categorized later, while the email really comes into its own if you&#039;re doing mobile blogging.  If WP would develop a really good smartphone app, then you&#039;d have something. </p>
<p>I also think about ways people can post from other apps to their WP blogs, but so far as your post alludes to, the options aren&#039;t all that great.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clint Lalonde</title>
		<link>http://clintlalonde.net/2009/09/24/4-alternative-blogging-interfaces-for-wordpress/comment-page-1/#comment-2993</link>
		<dc:creator>Clint Lalonde</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 01:50:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clintlalonde.net/?p=492#comment-2993</guid>
		<description>Thanks for that. I do need to test Word out a bit more, but I have to&lt;br /&gt;say my first post using Word turned out pretty clean. I was expecting&lt;br /&gt;a lot of puff code, but none of that came out. But, as I stated in my&lt;br /&gt;response to James above, I didn&#039;t do a lot of text formatting or try&lt;br /&gt;things other than insert links into the body of the post. I may find&lt;br /&gt;the code isn&#039;t so clean when I start pushing Word a bit. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for that. I do need to test Word out a bit more, but I have to<br />say my first post using Word turned out pretty clean. I was expecting<br />a lot of puff code, but none of that came out. But, as I stated in my<br />response to James above, I didn&#039;t do a lot of text formatting or try<br />things other than insert links into the body of the post. I may find<br />the code isn&#039;t so clean when I start pushing Word a bit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sahas</title>
		<link>http://clintlalonde.net/2009/09/24/4-alternative-blogging-interfaces-for-wordpress/comment-page-1/#comment-2992</link>
		<dc:creator>sahas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 01:20:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clintlalonde.net/?p=492#comment-2992</guid>
		<description>thanks for the linking to my article on blogging with word 2007! 
 
just wanted to give you a tip. publishing straight from word actually causes a mess of html formatting to occur. the best way to do it is write the article in word first. then copy the entire thing. go to your wordpress in the browser. in the text field there&#039;s the advance dropdown for the mce editor. in that there&#039;s a button called &quot;paste from word&quot;. click on that and paste what you copied into that special box. once you do it strips all the junk that word would have thrown in. 
 
hope that helps! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks for the linking to my article on blogging with word 2007! </p>
<p>just wanted to give you a tip. publishing straight from word actually causes a mess of html formatting to occur. the best way to do it is write the article in word first. then copy the entire thing. go to your wordpress in the browser. in the text field there&#039;s the advance dropdown for the mce editor. in that there&#039;s a button called &quot;paste from word&quot;. click on that and paste what you copied into that special box. once you do it strips all the junk that word would have thrown in. </p>
<p>hope that helps!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

